Talk:Geyser (3.5e Spell)

	Havvy is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4.
	Quite a boring spell.

i agree, that's the main reason it didn't get much attention when it was originally created in the Dragon Magazine, i added it to the wiki for reference to the Purifier class i created. (currently thinking i gave it too much) Snafusam Talk

When you say added, do you mean "transcribed" or "made my own variant"? - Tarkisflux ^Talk 03:31, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Made my own Variant of*, the general idea /name are the same as those of the dragon magazine, however it's slightly different just because i didn't like how limited it became so quickely in compairison to the other spells of its same level actually still need to buff it a bit, just to make it more balanced. right now i would still say it's UNDER-powered... but yes, it's NOT the exact same as the Dragon Magazine, so if you want the EXACT thing that's in the dragon magazine (Very-weak P.O.S.) it should be in Dragon magazine #334 Snafusam Talk

I just wanted to make sure that I didn't have to delete this for copyright infringement. Carry on. - Tarkisflux ^Talk 15:43, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

ahh, speaking of copyrights, File:Water-blade.jpg i am a bit lost w/ this one. i don't wanna get the site in trouble and not sure if this is protected or not. it's not hard to find and ive referenced the source (sekirei of Funimation/Square Enix)

We have a page for that sort of thing, Project:Image Policies. I don't know if that's fan art or a screen cap from the anime, but it's almost certainly copyright someone else. Lacking any definite license, it's best to assume fair use and follow the rules there. The policy page should help you figure out what the file page needs. - Tarkisflux ^Talk 19:45, 6 May 2013 (UTC)