|
|
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 5: |
Line 5: |
| | }} | | }} |
| | | | |
| − | i agree, that's the main reason it didn't get much attention when it was originally created in the Dragon Magazine, i added it to the wiki for reference to the [[Purifier (3.5e Prestige Class)|Purifier]] class i created. (currently thinking i gave it too much)
| + | == Non-Ray Ray == |
| | | | |
| − | :When you say added, do you mean "transcribed" or "made my own variant"? - [[User:Tarkisflux|Tarkisflux]] <sup>[[User talk:Tarkisflux|Talk]]</sup> 03:31, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
| + | Described as a ray, but is in fact not a ray. -- [[User:Eiji-kun|Eiji-kun]] ([[User talk:Eiji-kun|talk]]) 18:12, 30 July 2019 (MDT) |
| − | | |
| − | Made my own Variant of*, the general idea /name are the same as those of the dragon magazine, however it's slightly different just because i didn't like how limited it became so quickely in compairison to the other spells of its same level actually still need to buff it a bit, just to make it more balanced. right now i would still say it's UNDER-powered... but yes, it's NOT the exact same as the Dragon Magazine, so if you want the EXACT thing that's in the dragon magazine (Very-weak P.O.S.) it should be in Dragon magazine #334 [[User:Snafusam|Snafusam]] [[User talk:Snafusam|Talk]]
| |
Latest revision as of 00:12, 31 July 2019
|
Havvy is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4.
|
| Quite a boring spell.
|
Non-Ray Ray[edit]
Described as a ray, but is in fact not a ray. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 18:12, 30 July 2019 (MDT)
