Difference between revisions of "Talk:Shielded in Life (3.5e Feat)"

From Dungeons and Dragons Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Added rating.)
(Added rating.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Ratings ==
 
== Ratings ==
 +
{{Rating |rater=Quey
 +
|rating=dislike
 +
|reason=Why wouldn't a caster take it? It seems a bit overmuch. The special is a bit strange, and should probably be reworded for more precise effect. The overall concept is good, and this could be improved.
 +
}}
 
{{Rating |rater=Aarnott
 
{{Rating |rater=Aarnott
 
|rating=like
 
|rating=like

Revision as of 02:47, 15 August 2012

Ratings

RatedDislike.png Quey dislikes this article and rated it 1 of 4.
Why wouldn't a caster take it? It seems a bit overmuch. The special is a bit strange, and should probably be reworded for more precise effect. The overall concept is good, and this could be improved.
RatedLike.png Aarnott likes this article and rated it 3 of 4.
A feat that basically replaces an animated shield is awesome. Flavor-wise, D&D can seem lame when everyone has a big metal shield floating nearby them. It allows lightly armored characters to have their shield bonus and also still seem kung-fu-like.

The "Special" text is a bit confusing in that normally other ability scores don't grant shield bonuses to AC. The text implies that it wouldn't stack with regular AC bonuses or armor AC bonuses from ability scores, which is a bit weird. A bit of clarification could go a long way, I think.

RatedNeutral.png Foxwarrior is neutral on this article and rated it 2 of 4.
It often becomes a sort of must-have for SAD characters, especially caster types. I'm not sure I approve.

Armored?

Maybe "shielded in life" would be a better name, to prevent confusion with the Monk's ability. Surgo 22:31, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

Sure, I don't mind. --Ghostwheel 23:27, March 16, 2010 (UTC)
Flippin' awesome feat GW! I really like it and you covered all your bases should the Dex score change. --Jay Freedman 23:33, March 16, 2010 (UTC)