Talk:Construct (3.5e Subtype)

This Exists

And it's called "Augmented Construct". Augmented subtype exists for a reason. -- Eiji-kun (talk) 00:37, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Augmented subtype doesn't have those rules, as far as I can tell. Surgo (talk) 14:49, 6 April 2019 (MDT)

How is this any different than augmented construct?--Franken Kesey 09:04, 11 May 2019 (MDT)

Augmented subtype does not have the rules on this page. Augmented doesn't actually mean anything rules-wise. Surgo (talk) 09:07, 11 May 2019 (MDT)

I see. Thank you.--Franken Kesey 09:08, 11 May 2019 (MDT)

Ratings

	Franken Kesey opposes this article and rated it 0 of 4.
	Going to have to second Eiji, there is a lot of redundancy with subtypes. This page is unnecessary.

Redundant Subtypes

There are a lot of redundant subtypes. Bots, clockwork and construct could all be one subtype. There are there slight differences, sure, but three different subtypes of mostly the same thing is distracting. Suggesting to merge all the robot subtypes into one. Especially, since two of the authors have collaborated on other stuff before, finding a happy medium should be easier.--Franken Kesey 17:16, 27 April 2019 (MDT)